• Title of article

    The role of pelvic exenteration in the management of recurrent rectal cancer

  • Author/Authors

    James T. Kakuda، نويسنده , , Jeffrey P. Lamont، نويسنده , , David Z. J. Chu، نويسنده , , I. Benjamin Paz، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    660
  • To page
    664
  • Abstract
    Background Use of extirpative surgery in the setting of recurrent rectal cancer is controversial given the poor overall outcome of such patients and the morbidity associated with exenteration. Methods A retrospective review of patients treated for recurrent rectal cancer from 1990 to 2002 was performed. Results Twenty-two patients underwent pelvic exenteration. Seventeen underwent potentially curative resection, 5 were for palliation only. There was 1 operative death. Fifteen suffered at least 1 complication; 9 suffered multiple complications. Ten patients required readmission to the hospital. The overall disease-free interval was 11 months. Potentially curative and palliative resections resulted in median survivals of 20.4 and 8.4 months, respectively (P = 0.049). Conclusions While patients may derive oncologic and palliative benefits from exenteration, the price in terms of operative morbidity remains high. Newer measures of operative morbidity are necessary to better appraise the value of this radical approach to recurrent rectal cancer.
  • Keywords
    pelvic exenteration , Recurrent rectal cancer , morbidity , Quality of life , Palliation , rectal cancer
  • Journal title
    The American Journal of Surgery
  • Serial Year
    2003
  • Journal title
    The American Journal of Surgery
  • Record number

    617405