• Title of article

    Meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies using established residency training program assessment tools

  • Author/Authors

    Karen J. Brasel، نويسنده , , Dawn Bragg، نويسنده , , Deborah E. Simpson، نويسنده , , John A. Weigelt، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
  • Pages
    4
  • From page
    9
  • To page
    12
  • Abstract
    Background Most existing residency evaluation tools were constructed to evaluate the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. Methods Before ACGMEʹs six competency based assessment requirements for resident performance were developed, we created a residency evaluation tool with 5 domains important to successful surgical resident performance. Reliability was determined after 6 months of use. Factor analysis assessed whether the evaluation tool was a construct-valid measure of the ACGME competencies. Results Three hundred forty-three evaluations for 36 surgical residents were tested. The original evaluation tool was highly reliable with an overall reliability of 0.97. Factor analysis defined 4 new combinations of questions analogous to 4 of the ACGME competencies: professionalism (reliability 0.95), patient care (reliability 0.93), medical knowledge (reliability 0.92), and communication (reliability 0.92). The new competency clusters were correlated with each other to a moderate degree. Conclusions Our locally developed tool demonstrated high reliability and construct validity for 4 of 6 ACGME competencies. The correlation between factors suggests overlap between competencies.
  • Keywords
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies , Residency evaluation , Evaluation tools , Traditional rating form
  • Journal title
    The American Journal of Surgery
  • Serial Year
    2004
  • Journal title
    The American Journal of Surgery
  • Record number

    617613