Title of article
Attitudes of applicants for surgical residency toward work hour limitations
Author/Authors
George Miller، نويسنده , , Zubin M. Bamboat، نويسنده , , Frederick Allen، نويسنده , , Mary Ann Hopkins، نويسنده , , Thomas H. Gouge، نويسنده , , Thomas S. Riles، نويسنده , , Matthew M. Nalbandian، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
5
From page
131
To page
135
Abstract
Background
There is an ongoing debate regarding the merits of resident work-hour limitations. We postulated that this issue would be a factor in the decision-making process of applicants to surgical residency.
Methods
Candidates for surgical residency at a university-based program completed an anonymous survey during their visit. Data was analyzed by analysis of variance and the chi-square test.
Results
Most candidates viewed work-hour limitations as being favorable to their future training. Nevertheless, work-hour limitations ultimately were not a critical factor in the decision-making process compared with issues such as quality of training and program reputation. Candidates ranked “reading in surgery” the most likely way they would spend the leisure time afforded by work-hour limitations.
Conclusions
Most applicants for surgical residency consider work hour-limitations as being favorable to their training and view the extra free time as an opportunity for furthering their education. However, other issues take precedence when choosing a residency
Keywords
Residency , surgery , Work hours , Education
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Record number
617640
Link To Document