Title of article :
Selective versus total biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice caused by a hepatobiliary malignancy
Author/Authors :
Takeaki Ishizawa، نويسنده , , Kiyoshi Hasegawa، نويسنده , , Keiji Sano، نويسنده , , Hiroshi Imamura، نويسنده , , Norihiro Kokudo، نويسنده , , Masatoshi Makuuchi، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages :
6
From page :
149
To page :
154
Abstract :
Background Controversy exists regarding which approach is preferable among types of biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice before major hepatectomy: selective biliary drainage (SBD) only on the future remnant liver (FRL) or total biliary drainage (TBD). Methods There were 42 consecutive patients who underwent SBD (n = 15) or TBD (n = 27) for obstructive jaundice caused by a hepatobiliary malignancy, and subsequent portal vein embolization (PVE) before extended hemihepatectomy. The hypertrophy ratio, defined as the ratio of the FRL volume after PVE to that before PVE, was evaluated. The bilirubin clearance also was calculated. Results The hypertrophy ratio was higher in patients with SBD than in those with TBD (median, 128%; range, 111–152% vs median, 121%; range, 102–138%; P = .013). The bilirubin clearance of FRL with SBD was markedly improved after PVE compared with that in patients with TBD. Conclusions SBD is superior to TBD in promoting hypertrophy of the FRL induced by PVE and in guaranteeing good liver function before major hepatectomy.
Keywords :
Biliary drainage , Portal vein embolization , Obstructive jaundice , hypertrophy , Bilirubin clearance
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery
Serial Year :
2006
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery
Record number :
618550
Link To Document :
بازگشت