Title of article
Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus redo endarterectomy for recurrent stenosis
Author/Authors
Matthew J. Bettendorf، نويسنده , , M. Ashraf Mansour، نويسنده , , Alan T. Davis، نويسنده , , George T. Sugiyama، نويسنده , , Robert F. Cali، نويسنده , , Jill M. Gorsuch، نويسنده , , Robert F. Cuff، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
4
From page
356
To page
359
Abstract
Background
Carotid angioplasty and stent (CAS) is an alternative to redo carotid endarterectomy (RCEA) for recurrent carotid stenosis (RCS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of CAS in the treatment of RCS.
Methods
In an 8-year period, all patients presenting for treatment of RCS were followed-up prospectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with unfavorable outcomes.
Results
There were 45 CAS and 46 RCEA procedures performed in 75 patients. One patient in each group suffered a stroke. There were no deaths. The hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for CAS. Secondary recurrence was higher after RCEA (14% vs 6.1%) and failure to take β-blockers was an independent predictor for multiple recurrences.
Conclusions
CAS is a safe and effective method to treat patients with RCS and may become the procedure of choice for this disease.
Keywords
Stenosis , Endarterectomy , angioplasty , stent , stroke , carotid artery
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Record number
618593
Link To Document