Title of article :
The 4-portal technique decreases adverse effects in preoperative radiotherapy for advanced rectal cancer: comparison between the 2-portal and the 4-portal techniques
Author/Authors :
Tomomichi Kiyomatsu، نويسنده , , Toshiaki Watanabe، نويسنده , , Tetsuichiro Muto، نويسنده , , Hirokazu Nagawa، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Abstract :
Background
This study evaluated the difference of postoperative complications according to the radiation technique after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer.
Methods
Among 224 patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative radiotherapy, 159 patients were treated with the 2-portal technique and 65 patients with the 4-portal technique. Comparison was performed between these 2 groups.
Results
The 5-year disease-free survival and local recurrence rate showed no difference between the 2 groups. There was also no difference in postoperative mortality. However, the 4-portal group had a significantly lower morbidity rate of 36.9% than the 2-portal group of 54.1% (P = .02). The rate of major complications that needed reoperation was also significantly lower in the 4-portal group (0%) than the 2-portal group (11.9%) (P = .01). The anastomotic leakage rate was significantly lower in the former (2.8% vs 20.0%, P = .033).
Conclusion
The 4-portal technique is a better technique than the 2-portal technique for decreasing postoperative complications in preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer.
Keywords :
anastomotic leakage , Portal technique , Preoperative radiotherapy , rectal cancer , mortality , morbidity
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery