Title of article :
An institutional experience with laparoscopic gastric bypass complications seen in the first year compared with open gastric bypass complications during the same period
Author/Authors :
Craig See، نويسنده , , Preston L. Carter، نويسنده , , David Elliott، نويسنده , , Philip Mullenix، نويسنده , , William Eggebroten، نويسنده , , Frank Clifford Porter، نويسنده , , David Watts، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages :
6
From page :
533
To page :
538
Abstract :
Background: Complication rates for laparoscopic bariatric surgery remain in evolution. Methods: Single institution review of the initial year’s experience with laparoscopic gastric bypass compared with open gastric bypass complications for the same period. Results: There were 20 laparoscopic and 52 open gastric bypass procedures. Five laparoscopic patients had major complications. There were 4 anastomotic leaks. Nine open bypass patients had major complications, with 2 leaks. Leak rate was 20% for the laparoscopic group and 4% for the open group. All leaks in both groups led to substantial morbidity. There were two deaths, one in each group. The laparoscopic death was from postleak sepsis. Conclusions: Gastric bypass, whether done open or laparoscopically, has significant surgical risk. Complication profiles differed between the two groups. Anastomotic leaks were significantly more frequent in the laparoscopic group, probably related to the learning curve. There is a continued need for open surgery in many bariatric patients.
Keywords :
bariatric surgery , surgical complications , obesity , laparoscopic surgery
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery
Serial Year :
2002
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery
Record number :
621399
Link To Document :
بازگشت