• Title of article

    Is thyroid frozen section too much for too little?

  • Author/Authors

    Melanie L. Richards، نويسنده , , Robert Chisholm، نويسنده , , Jan M. Bruder، نويسنده , , William E. Strodel، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    510
  • To page
    514
  • Abstract
    Background The role of frozen section (FS) in thyroid disease is controversial. The goal of this study was to identify a cohort of patients who may or may not benefit from FS. Methods Two hundred thirty-one patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evaluated in regard to fine-needle aspiration (FNA), FS, and the extent of surgery. Results In all, 155 patients underwent FNA, 140 patients underwent FS, and 103 patients had both. A final diagnosis of malignancy was obtained in 47 of 231 patients. FNA had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 99%, and FS had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 100% for diagnosing malignancy. Accounting for the clinical findings and FNA results, FS results altered the extent of thyroidectomy in 1 of 103 patients. Conclusions The increased costs for the operative time and the pathologists needed to obtain routine FS are not supported with any substantial benefit in patient outcome.
  • Keywords
    Thyroid , Frozen section , Thyroidectomy , fine-needle aspiration
  • Journal title
    The American Journal of Surgery
  • Serial Year
    2002
  • Journal title
    The American Journal of Surgery
  • Record number

    621557