Title of article :
Is thyroid frozen section too much for too little?
Author/Authors :
Melanie L. Richards، نويسنده , , Robert Chisholm، نويسنده , , Jan M. Bruder، نويسنده , , William E. Strodel، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Abstract :
Background
The role of frozen section (FS) in thyroid disease is controversial. The goal of this study was to identify a cohort of patients who may or may not benefit from FS.
Methods
Two hundred thirty-one patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evaluated in regard to fine-needle aspiration (FNA), FS, and the extent of surgery.
Results
In all, 155 patients underwent FNA, 140 patients underwent FS, and 103 patients had both. A final diagnosis of malignancy was obtained in 47 of 231 patients. FNA had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 99%, and FS had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 100% for diagnosing malignancy. Accounting for the clinical findings and FNA results, FS results altered the extent of thyroidectomy in 1 of 103 patients.
Conclusions
The increased costs for the operative time and the pathologists needed to obtain routine FS are not supported with any substantial benefit in patient outcome.
Keywords :
Thyroid , Frozen section , Thyroidectomy , fine-needle aspiration
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery