Title of article :
Governance Choices for Corporate Social Responsibility: to Contribute, Collaborate or Internalize?
Author/Authors :
Husted، Bryan W. نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages :
-480
From page :
481
To page :
0
Abstract :
Within a competitive business environment where resources are limited, it is increasingly important for senior management to make every investment count. Measuring ‘return on investment’ occurs at every level of operations—so why not also in the arena of Corporate Social activity? Until now, much research has focused on finding the link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and increased business performance. Researchers have not examined the cost implications associated with the different forms of governance utilized by companies to implement their CSR activities, e.g., outsourcing through charitable contributions, developing an in-house program, or creating a more collaborative model, which benefits both the company and the partner nonprofit organization. Careful examination and evaluation of these costs will help senior management choose the governance structure that will maximize the benefits they reap from CSR activities. Drawing upon insights from organizational economics, this article develops a framework to compare the alternative modes of CSR governance and identifies the key drivers that affect governance choice, including associated costs. Most importantly, it provides a decision-making tool that can guide senior management in this vital choice as a way to contribute to the competitive advantage of the firm.
Keywords :
Property rights , Privatization , Structures
Journal title :
LONG RANGE PLANNING
Serial Year :
2003
Journal title :
LONG RANGE PLANNING
Record number :
62954
Link To Document :
بازگشت