Author/Authors :
Caroline Cheng، نويسنده , , Frank Helderman، نويسنده , , Dennie Tempel، نويسنده , , Dolf Segers، نويسنده , , Beerend Hierck، نويسنده , , Rob Poelmann، نويسنده , , Arie van Tol، نويسنده , , Dirk J. Duncker، نويسنده , , Daniëlle Robbers-Visser، نويسنده , , Nicolette T.C. Ursem، نويسنده , , Rien van Haperen، نويسنده , , Jolanda J. Wentzel، نويسنده , , Frank Gijsen، نويسنده , , Anton F.W. van der Steen، نويسنده , , Rini de Crom، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Wall shear stress (WSS), the frictional force between blood and endothelium, is an important determinant of vascular function. It is generally assumed that WSS remains constant at a reference value of 15 dyn/cm2. In a study of small rodents, we realized that this assumption could not be valid. This review presents an overview of recent studies in large and small animals where shear stress was measured, derived from velocity measurements or otherwise, in large vessels.
The data show that large variations exist within a single species (human: variation of 2–16 N/m2). Moreover, when we compared different species at the same location within the arterial tree, an inverse relationship between animal size and wall shear stress was noted. When we related WSS to diameter, a unique relationship was derived for all species studied.
This relationship could not be described by the well-known r3 law of Murray, but by the r2 law introduced by Zamir et al. in 1972.
In summary, by comparing data from the literature, we have shown that: (i) the assumption of a physiological WSS level of 15 dyn/cm2 for all straight vessels in the arterial tree is incorrect; (ii) WSS is not constant throughout the vascular tree; (iii) WSS varies between species; (iv) WSS is inversely related to the vessel diameter. These data support an “r2 law” rather than Murrayʹs r3 law for the larger vessels in the arterial tree.
Keywords :
Wall Shear Stress , Animal , mouse , rat , Mice , rabbit , dog , Patients , In Vivo , Clinical , human , Doppler