Title of article :
Contamination of patientsʹ files in intensive care units: An indication of strict handwashing after entering case notes
Author/Authors :
Bodh R. Panhotra، نويسنده , , Anil K. Saxena، نويسنده , , Abdulrahman S. Al-Mulhim، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
4
From page :
398
To page :
401
Abstract :
Background The extent to which bedside patientsʹ files become contaminated and the range of bacterial flora attributable to contamination in high-risk areas of the hospital are not known with certainty. The aim of the present study was to determine the degree of contamination of the patientʹs files and also to analyze and compare the spectrum of contaminant bacterial flora between the intensive care unit (ICU) and surgical wards, the 2 most high-risk areas for nosocomial transmission of infection. Methods Microbiologic samples were collected from the exposed outer surface of the patientsʹ files kept bedside in the ICU and surgical wards with sterile swabs moistened with sterile normal saline. Swabs were cultured within an hour of collection on blood agar and MacConkeyʹs agar plates, which were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. Gram-negative bacilli were identified by Gramʹs stain, catalase, oxidase tests, and API 20E and API 20NE. Staphylococcus species were identified by Gramʹs stain, catalase test, and tube coagulase test. Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated bacteria was determined by the disk diffusion technique according to the criteria of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Results In ICU, 85.2% (87/102) and, in surgical wards, 24.7% (22/89) of patientʹs files were found to be contaminated with pathogenic and potentially pathogenic bacteria (OR, 17.664; 95% CI: 8.050-39.423; P < .0001). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most commonly isolated bacteria (32.3%, 33/102) in ICUs, whereas Staphylococcus aureus was the peak contaminant (11.2%, 10/89) of the files in surgical wards. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from 6.8% (7/102) of ICU patientʹs files, whereas only 1.1% (1/89) of patientʹs files in surgical wards were contaminated with MRSA (OR, 6.484; 95% CI: 3.215-13.463; P < .0001).The multidrug-resistant P aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Serretia marcesens isolated from the patientʹs files had the same antibiotic resistance pattern as of these bacteria isolated from the patients. Conclusion The majority of the patientʹs files in ICUs were contaminated often with multidrug-resistant bacteria and even MRSA. Contaminated files could be a source of transmission of infection. To prevent this, handwashing practice should be strictly followed after attending the patient and before entering the case notes in the patientʹs file. The maintenance of good hand hygiene by the health care workers (HCWs) after handling contaminated files should perhaps be the most prudent approach to prevent patient-patient transmission of infection in high-risk areas including ICU and surgical wards.
Journal title :
American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC)
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC)
Record number :
636260
Link To Document :
بازگشت