Title of article :
The Effectiveness of Interventions for Preventing Injuries in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Review Review Article
Author/Authors :
Marika M. Lehtola، نويسنده , ,
Henk F. van der Molen
، نويسنده , , Jorma Lappalainen، نويسنده , , Peter L.T. Hoonakker، نويسنده , , Hongwei Hsiao، نويسنده , , Roger A. Haslam، نويسنده , , Andrew R. Hale، نويسنده , , Jos H. Verbeek، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
The Effectiveness of Interventions for Preventing Injuries in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Review Review Article
Pages 77-85
Marika M. Lehtola, Henk F. van der Molen, Jorma Lappalainen, Peter L.T. Hoonakker, Hongwei Hsiao, Roger A. Haslam, Andrew R. Hale, Jos H. Verbeek
Close Close preview | Purchase PDF (205 K) | Related articles | Related reference work articles
AbstractAbstract | Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences
Background
Occupational injury rates among construction workers are the highest among the major industries. A number of injury-prevention interventions have been proposed, yet the effectiveness of these is uncertain. Thus a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for preventing occupational injuries among construction workers was conducted.
Methods
Seven databases were searched, from the earliest available dates through June 2006, for published findings of injury prevention in construction studies. Acceptable study designs included RCTs; controlled before–after studies; and interrupted time series (ITS). Effect sizes of similar interventions were pooled into a meta-analysis in January 2007.
Results
Of 7522 titles found, four ITS studies and one controlled ITS study met the inclusion criteria. The overall methodologic quality was low. No indications of publication bias were found. Findings from a safety-campaign study and a drug-free-workplace study indicated that both interventions significantly reduced the level and the trend of injuries. Three studies that evaluated legislation did not decrease the level (ES 0.69; 95% CI=−1.70, 3.09) and made the downward trend (ES 0.28; 95% CI=0.05, 0.51) of injuries less favorable.
Conclusions
Limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of a multifaceted safety campaign and a multifaceted drug program, but no evidence was found that legislation is effective to prevent nonfatal or fatal injuries in the construction industry.
Article Outline
Introduction
Methods
Searching Trials
Eligibility of Studies
Methodologic Quality
Data Extraction
Measuring Intervention Effect
Data Synthesis
Results
Selection of Studies Meeting the Inclusion Criteria
Description of Included Studies
Methodologic Quality of Included Studies
Intervention Effectiveness of Included Studies
Effectiveness of Legislation on Fatal and Nonfatal Injuries
Re-analysis of results of the original studies
Meta-analysis of the re-analyzed studies
Effectiveness of a Safety Campaign on Nonfatal Injuries
Re-analysis of results of the original study
Effectiveness of a Drug-Free-Workplace Program on Nonfatal Injuries
Re-analysis of results of the original study
Discussion
Implementation Level and Strategy
Secondary Effects and Ethical Considerations
Other Studies Not Meeting the Selection Criteria
Quantity and Quality of Evaluative Research
Conclusion
Implications for Practice
Implications for Research
Acknowledgements
References
Journal title :
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Journal title :
American Journal of Preventive Medicine