Title of article
Women cannot discriminate between differential paracervical block techniques applied to opposite sides of the cervix
Author/Authors
Richard A. Grossman، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
Pages
2
From page
935
To page
936
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether women can discriminate better from less effective paracervical block techniques applied to opposite sides of the cervix. If this discrimination could be made, it would be possible to compare different techniques and thus improve the quality of paracervical anesthesia. Two milliliters of local anesthetic was applied to one side and 6 ml to the other side of volunteersʹ cervices before cervical dilation. Statistical examination was by sequential analysis. The study was stopped after 47 subjects had entered, when sequential analysis found that there was no significant difference in womenʹs perception of pain. Nine women reported more pain on the side with more anesthesia and eight reported more pain on the side with less anesthesia. Because the amount of anesthesia did not make a difference, the null hypothesis (that women cannot discriminate between different anesthetic techniques) was accepted. Women are not able to discriminate different doses of local anesthetic when applied to opposite sides of the cervix.
Keywords
Anesthesia , paracervical , abortion , therapeutic , Sequential analysis
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
1996
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
639110
Link To Document