• Title of article

    Postpartum depression: A comparison of screening and routine clinical evaluation

  • Author/Authors

    Grace G. Evins، نويسنده , , James P. Theofrastous، نويسنده , , Shelley L. Galvin، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
  • Pages
    3
  • From page
    1080
  • To page
    1082
  • Abstract
    Objective: This study compared the efficacy of routine clinical evaluation with that of screening with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for the detection of postpartum depression in a residency training program practice. Study Design: Three hundred ninety-one patients during a period of 1 year were assigned according to delivery date to screening for postpartum depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale or to a control group who had only spontaneous detection during routine clinical evaluation. The incidences of postpartum depression detection and demographic characteristics were compared between 79 patients in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale group and 96 patients in the clinical evaluation group by means of χ2 analyses. Results: The incidence of postpartum depression detection with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was significantly higher than the incidence of spontaneous detection during routine clinical evaluation (35.4% and 6.3%, respectively; P = .001). Conclusions: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is an effective adjunct to clinical interview for diagnosis of postpartum depression and should be considered in residency training. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1080-2.)
  • Keywords
    Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale , Postpartum depression , prevalence , screening
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    2000
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    640818