Title of article
Emergency contraception and fire extinguishers: A prevention paradox
Author/Authors
David A. Grimes، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages
3
From page
1536
To page
1538
Abstract
Fires and unintended pregnancies are important causes of morbidity, mortality, and financial loss in the United States. Home fire extinguishers and emergency contraception are both effective preventive interventions. The disparity between access to fire extinguishers and emergency contraception is irrational and indirectly hurts womenʹs health. Although fire extinguishers require the user to make a diagnosis, choose the appropriate treatment, and assume some risk of serious injury and death, these canisters of pressurized chemicals are widely available without restriction. In contrast, women face several unnecessary obstacles to overcome before using emergency contraception, which is both simpler and safer to use. Clearly, a double standard prevails in prevention strategies for women. The Food and Drug Administration should approve over-the-counter availability of emergency contraception without further study or delay. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1536-8.)
Keywords
safety , levonorgestrel , emergency contraception , prevention
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2002
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
642172
Link To Document