Title of article :
Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor
Author/Authors :
Margaret R. Chou، نويسنده , , Doron Kreiser، نويسنده , , M.Mark Taslimi، نويسنده , , Maurice L. Druzin، نويسنده , , Yasser Y. El-Sayed، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Abstract :
Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine whether ultrasonography is more accurate than vaginal examination in the determination of fetal occiput position in the second stage of labor.
Study design
Eighty-eight patients in the second stage of labor were evaluated by vaginal examination and by combined transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound examination to determine occiput position. These predictions of position were compared with the actual delivery position at vaginal delivery after spontaneous restitution or at cesarean delivery. Different examiners performed the vaginal examinations and the ultrasound examinations. Each examiner was blinded to the determination of the other examiner.
Results
Vaginal examination determined fetal occiput position correctly 71.6% of the time; ultrasound examination determined fetal occiput position correctly 92.0% of the time (P = .018).
Conclusion
Ultrasound examination is more accurate than vaginal examination in the diagnosis of fetal occiput position in the second stage of labor.
Keywords :
Fetal occiput positionOcciput posteriorUltrasound examinationSecond stage of labor
Journal title :
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Journal title :
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology