Title of article
Racial/ethnic differences in perineal, vaginal and cervical lacerations
Author/Authors
Linda M. Hopkins، نويسنده , , Aaron B. Caughey، نويسنده , , David V. Glidden، نويسنده , , Russell K. Laros Jr، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
5
From page
455
To page
459
Abstract
Objective
To determine if variation exists between ethnicities for risk of perineal, vaginal, and cervical laceration at vaginal delivery.
Study design
Retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women who underwent vaginal delivery of a vertex presentation. Predictor variable was ethnicity with outcome variables cervical, vaginal, and second-, third-, or fourth-degree perineal laceration. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to control for confounders.
Results
Of the 17,216 who met criteria, Filipino (OR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.64-2.25) and Chinese (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.33-1.92) women were at greatest risk for third- and fourth-degree laceration. Only Filipino (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.10-1.57) and other Asian (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.41) women were at slightly increased risk of vaginal laceration. No differences were seen for cervical laceration.
Conclusion
Different ethnicities are at widely varying risk of perineal laceration, but little difference exists for vaginal or cervical lacerations. Research into the mechanisms behind this should investigate differences in perineal anatomy.
Keywords
Perineal lacerationVaginal lacerationCervical lacerationEpisiotomyVaginal delivery
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
644957
Link To Document