Title of article
Removal of the retained cervical stump
Author/Authors
Wesley S. Hilger، نويسنده , , Antonio R. Pizarro، نويسنده , , Javier F. Magrina، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
5
From page
2117
To page
2121
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to identify indications for and complications of abdominal or vaginal surgical removal of the cervical stump after previous supracervical hysterectomy.
Study design
This was a retrospective chart review of trachelectomy patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, or Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, between January 1974 and December 2003.
Results
Of 335 patients with a history of supracervical hysterectomy who subsequently required trachelectomy, 25 were excluded from study. Half of the remaining 310 patients had trachelectomy between 1974 and 1983, an average of 26 years after hysterectomy. The indication in three quarters of trachelectomies performed vaginally was prolapse. The vaginal approach had significantly fewer complications than the abdominal approach.
Conclusion
Removal of the cervical stump is infrequent and has declined over a 30-year period. The decline in trachelectomy may be because of a decreasing number of supracervical hysterectomies performed. When trachelectomy is performed vaginally, prolapse is the most common indication, and there are few complications.
Keywords
Cervical stumpSupracervicalhysterectomyTrachelectom
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
645199
Link To Document