• Title of article

    A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor

  • Author/Authors

    Steven L. Bloom، نويسنده , , Brian M. Casey، نويسنده , , Joseph I. Schaffer، نويسنده , , Donald D. McIntire، نويسنده , , Kenneth J. Leveno، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    4
  • From page
    10
  • To page
    13
  • Abstract
    Objective The objective of this study was to compare obstetrical outcomes associated with coached versus uncoached pushing during the second stage of labor. Study design Upon reaching the second stage, previously consented nulliparous women with uncomplicated labors and without epidural analgesia were randomly assigned to coached (n = 163) versus uncoached (n = 157) pushing. Women allocated to coaching received standardized closed glottis pushing instructions by certified nurse-midwives with proper ventilation encouraged between contractions. These midwives also attended those women assigned to no coaching to ensure that any expulsive efforts were involuntary. Results The second stage of labor was abbreviated by approximately 13 minutes in coached women (P = .01). There were no other clinically significant immediate maternal or neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups. Conclusion Although associated with a slightly shorter second stage, coached maternal pushing confers no other advantages and withholding such coaching is not harmful.
  • Keywords
    Coached pushingUncoached pushingSecond-stage labormanagement
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    645220