Title of article
A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor
Author/Authors
Steven L. Bloom، نويسنده , , Brian M. Casey، نويسنده , , Joseph I. Schaffer، نويسنده , , Donald D. McIntire، نويسنده , , Kenneth J. Leveno، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
4
From page
10
To page
13
Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to compare obstetrical outcomes associated with coached versus uncoached pushing during the second stage of labor.
Study design
Upon reaching the second stage, previously consented nulliparous women with uncomplicated labors and without epidural analgesia were randomly assigned to coached (n = 163) versus uncoached (n = 157) pushing. Women allocated to coaching received standardized closed glottis pushing instructions by certified nurse-midwives with proper ventilation encouraged between contractions. These midwives also attended those women assigned to no coaching to ensure that any expulsive efforts were involuntary.
Results
The second stage of labor was abbreviated by approximately 13 minutes in coached women (P = .01). There were no other clinically significant immediate maternal or neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
Although associated with a slightly shorter second stage, coached maternal pushing confers no other advantages and withholding such coaching is not harmful.
Keywords
Coached pushingUncoached pushingSecond-stage labormanagement
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
645220
Link To Document