• Title of article

    Myth of the ideal cesarean section rate: Commentary and historic perspective

  • Author/Authors

    Ronald M. Cyr، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    932
  • To page
    936
  • Abstract
    Attempts to define, or enforce, an “ideal” cesarean section rate are futile, and should be abandoned. The cesarean rate is a consequence of individual value-laden clinical decisions, and is not amenable to the methods of evidence-based medicine. The influence of academic authority figures on the cesarean rate in the US is placed in historic context. Like other population health indices, the cesarean section rate is an indirect result of American public policy during the last century. Without major changes in the way health and maternity care are delivered in the US, the rate will continue to increase without improving population outcomes.
  • Keywords
    Cesarean section rateMythHistory of cesareansectionJohn WhitridgeWilliamsEvidence-basedmedicine
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    645379