Title of article
Myth of the ideal cesarean section rate: Commentary and historic perspective
Author/Authors
Ronald M. Cyr، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
5
From page
932
To page
936
Abstract
Attempts to define, or enforce, an “ideal” cesarean section rate are futile, and should be abandoned. The cesarean rate is a consequence of individual value-laden clinical decisions, and is not amenable to the methods of evidence-based medicine. The influence of academic authority figures on the cesarean rate in the US is placed in historic context. Like other population health indices, the cesarean section rate is an indirect result of American public policy during the last century. Without major changes in the way health and maternity care are delivered in the US, the rate will continue to increase without improving population outcomes.
Keywords
Cesarean section rateMythHistory of cesareansectionJohn WhitridgeWilliamsEvidence-basedmedicine
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
645379
Link To Document