A surgical skills laboratory improves residentsʹ knowledge and performance of episiotomy repair

Objective This study was undertaken to assess whether a surgical skills laboratory improves residentsʹ knowledge and performance of episiotomy repair. Study design Twenty-four first- and second-year residents were randomly assigned to either a surgical skills laboratory on episiotomy repair or traditional teaching alone. Pre- and posttests assessed basic knowledge. Blinded attending physicians assessed performance, evaluating residents on second-degree laceration/episiotomy repairs in the clinical setting with 3 validated tools: a task-specific checklist, global rating scale, and a pass-fail grade. Results Postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents participating in the laboratory scored significantly better on all 3 surgical assessment tools: the checklist, the global score, and the pass/fail analysis. All the residents who had the teaching laboratory demonstrated significant improvements on knowledge and the skills checklist. PGY-2 residents did not benefit as much as PGY-1 residents. Conclusion A surgical skills laboratory improved residentsʹ knowledge and performance in the clinical setting. Improvement was greatest for PGY-1 residents.