Title of article :
Why compensation cannot replace trade retaliation in the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding
Author/Authors :
BRYAN MERCURIO، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages :
24
From page :
315
To page :
338
Abstract :
Throughout the course of the DSU Review, Members and commentators alike have proposed numerous modifications to the WTO DSU covering a wide range of areas. One area which has received quite a bit of attention is that of retaliatory measures in the implementation phase of the dispute settlement process. This article does not attempt to recap the debate over the appropriateness of trade retaliation or even to discuss all potential amendments targeting this issue. It does, however, identify some of the key criticisms of trade retaliation before analyzing and evaluating the worthiness of trade and/or financial compensation as an alternative. The article finds that neither trade nor financial compensation will do much to resolve the prominent criticisms of trade retaliation while also finding both options would add several uncertainties to the system and, far from increasing compliance with the rulings and recommendations of the DSB, could in fact increase the instances of non-compliance.
Journal title :
World Trade Review
Serial Year :
2009
Journal title :
World Trade Review
Record number :
661920
Link To Document :
بازگشت