Title of article :
Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews*
Author/Authors :
James Hartley، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Pages :
6
From page :
332
To page :
337
Abstract :
Background: There is a small body of research on improving the clarity of abstracts in general that is relevant to improving the clarity of abstracts of systematic reviews. Objectives: To summarize this earlier research and indicate its implications for writing the abstracts of systematic reviews. Method: Literature review with commentary on three main features affecting the clarity of abstracts: their language, structure, and typographical presentation. Conclusions: The abstracts of systematic reviews should be easier to read than the abstracts of medical research articles, as they are targeted at a wider audience. The aims, methods, results, and conclusions of systematic reviews need to be presented in a consistent way to help search and retrieval. The typographic detailing of the abstracts (type- sizes, spacing, and weights) should be planned to help, rather than confuse, the reader.
Journal title :
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
Serial Year :
2000
Journal title :
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
Record number :
663413
Link To Document :
بازگشت