Title of article :
Theorizing Politics, Politicizing Theory, and the Responsibility That Runs Between
Author/Authors :
Piki Ish-Shalom، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages :
14
From page :
303
To page :
316
Abstract :
What are social science theorists’ responsibilities for the effects of their theories in the real world? I maintain that politicians and ideologues place theories in their political agendas without necessarily heeding their actual content. Hence, the ramifications of theories in the real world aremostly the result of political uses and, at times, political abuses. Consequently, theorists cannot be held morally responsible for these. They do, however, bear the obligation to examine if there are some intrinsic features of theorization and theory that render these susceptible to public misinterpretation and vulnerable to political abuse. Pointing to the rhetorical capital inherent in theories, and supported by examples involving democratic-peace theory and its political destinies, I conclude that, to discharge this task, social science theorists should substitute the prevailing objective ethic with a normative one.
Journal title :
Perspectives on Politics
Serial Year :
2009
Journal title :
Perspectives on Politics
Record number :
665218
Link To Document :
بازگشت