Title of article :
Scholasticism in Political Science
Author/Authors :
Lawrence M. Mead، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages :
12
From page :
453
To page :
464
Abstract :
Criticism of trends in political science centers on specific methodologies—quantitative methods or rational choice. However, the more worrisome development is scholasticism—a tendency for research to become overspecialized and ingrown. I define that trend more closely and document its growth through increases in numbers of journals, organized sections in the American Political Science Association, and divisions within the APSA conference. I also code articles published in the American Political Science Review to show a growth in scholastic features in recent decades. The changes affect all fields in political science. Scholasticism serves values of rigor. To restrain it will require reemphasizing relevance to real-world issues and audiences. To do this should also help restore morale among political scientists.
Journal title :
Perspectives on Politics
Serial Year :
2010
Journal title :
Perspectives on Politics
Record number :
665272
Link To Document :
بازگشت