• Title of article

    Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods

  • Author/Authors

    Juha Siikam?ki، نويسنده , , David F. Layton، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    18
  • From page
    122
  • To page
    139
  • Abstract
    This study investigates the convergent validity of discrete choice contingent valuation (CV) and contingent rating/ranking (CR) methods using flexible econometric methods. Our results suggest that CV and CR can produce consistent data (achieve convergent validity) when respondentʹs preferred choices and the same changes in environmental quality are considered. We also find that CR models that go beyond modeling the preferred choice and include additional ranks cannot be pooled with the CV models. Accounting for preference heterogeneity via random coefficient models and their flexible structure does not make rejection of the hypothesis of convergent validity less likely, but instead rejects the hypothesis to about the same degree or perhaps more frequently than fixed parameter models commonly used in the literature.
  • Keywords
    nonmarket valuation , Random coefficients , Rayleigh , Stated preferences , Discrete choice methods , Data pooling , Habitatconservation
  • Journal title
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
  • Record number

    704065