Author/Authors :
E. K. Garger، نويسنده , , F. O. Hoffman، نويسنده , , K. M. Thiessen، نويسنده , , D. Galeriu، نويسنده , , A. I. Kryshev، نويسنده , , T. Lev، نويسنده , , C. W. Miller، نويسنده , , S. K. Nair، نويسنده , , N. Talerko، نويسنده , , B. Watkins، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Atmospheric resuspension of radionuclides can be a secondary source of contamination after a release has stopped, as well as a source of contamination for people and areas not exposed to the original release. A test scenario based on measurements collected after the Chernobyl accident was used to evaluate existing mathematical models for contaminant resuspension from soil, to examine resuspension processes on both local and regional scales, and to investigate the importance of seasonal variations of these processes. Model predictions from 15 participants were compared with measured air concentrations and resuspension factors to investigate and explain the discrepancies both among model predictions and between model predictions and observations and thus to evaluate the predictive capabilities and drawbacks of commonly used generic resuspension models. The empirical models tested can give predictions within an order of magnitude of observations or better if adequately calibrated for site-specific conditions, but they do not describe the process-level events or account for spatial heterogeneity or temporal variations.