Author/Authors :
Matilda Dorotic، نويسنده , , Tammo H.A. Bijmolt and Peter C. Verhoef، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
In examining the research literature on occupational health and safety (OHS), this
paper argues that the growth in the number of specialists in OHS has resulted in an
emphasis on policy and practice away from more scholastic concerns previously
addressed by academics in the disciplines of psychology and sociology. A hiatus has
occurred, and this is evidenced by the general absence of studies in management, even
though OHS is increasingly seen as a key operational and strategic concern of business
organizations. The authors call for OHS to be placed firmly on the research agenda of
management scholars, and advocate the need for greater conceptual development,
empirical study and theoretical reflection to complement existing pragmatic concerns
of OHS specialists. In this review, the contributions of psychology, sociology, industrial
relations and management studies are assessed, and five categories of specialist OHS
literature are analysed, namely: prescriptive; systematic OHS management; success
based; error and disaster based; and culture, climate and high-reliability studies. The
conceptual and methodological limitations of this specialist focus are discussed, and
future research opportunities are highlighted, for which the authors argue that management
scholars embrace a range of methodological approaches. The authors advocate
the value of extended case studies which examine OHS in context and over time in
particular workplace settings. There remains considerable scope to develop this field
further and, in conclusion, particular attention is drawn to the value of processoriented
contextual approaches for understanding OHS management in organizations.