Abstract :
This paper revisits “the Mench ´ u controversy” by examining the relationship between “truth”,
politics and fear in the “making of the worlds.” The author argue that “Mench´u controversy”
can teach us a lot about how “truth” involves a politics of containment whereby “others” are
contained by the judgment that they have failed the truth at the very moment that they
challenge how some “truths” are given or become givens. Such judgments are not simply
about reading the testimonios of others as “perjured”, but also work to construct others as
fearsome and threatening, such that the defence of truth becomes “a matter of life and
death.” To explore the role of fear in containing others, the author offers a reading of the
Mench´u controversy alongside the reception given to Sunera Thobani’s speech in which she
criticizes the United States’ “war on terrorism.” She shows how Thobani’s speech is
constructed as an act of terror because it calls into question the very “truths” that have
justified the war, by showing that they rely on an ontological distinction between legitimate
and illegitimate violence. The paper relates both the Mench ´u and Thobani cases to broader
discourses of fear and anxiety that have circulated since September 11 2001 and argues that
fear works to secure “truths” precisely through the narration of crisis or insecurity. Rather
than considering fear as coming from within a subject, or as a characteristic of an object, the
author suggests that fear works to effect the very boundaries between subjects and others,
partly through the feeling that such boundaries have already been threatened by the
presence of others. She also shows how fear operates as an affective economy of truth: fear
slides between signs and sticks to bodies by constituting them as its objects. In making this
argument, she shows how fear sticks to some bodies and not others. For example, the
judgment that somebody “could be” a terrorist draws on past and affective associations that
stick various signs (such as Muslim, fundamentalist, terrorist) together. At the same time,
fear is reproduced precisely by the threat that such bodies “may pass (us) by.” Such bodies
become constructed as fearsome and as a threat to the very truths that are reified as “life
itself.” This paper hence shows how truth becomes an affective technique of containment in
which the failure to contain is the justification of containment. The author concludes that
if truth is a matter of containers and containment – about who or what gets contained to
allow certain worlds to become given – then the risk taken by subaltern women, such as
Rigoberta Mench´u and Sunera Thobani, in speaking out against such truths is the risk of
making an-other kind of world.
