Title of article :
WHEN INTEGRATION DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY INTEGRATION Different Conceptualizations of Acculturation Orientations Lead to Different Classifications
Author/Authors :
BORIS SNAUWAERT، نويسنده , , BART SOENENS NORBERT VANBESELAERE، نويسنده , , FILIP BOEN، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages :
9
From page :
231
To page :
239
Abstract :
This study compared three conceptualizations of acculturation orientations (i.e., contact, adoption, and identification) in two samples of ethnic minority members (N= 290) in Belgium. In line with the hypotheses, these conceptualizations yielded substantially different distributions of participants across four acculturation orientations (i.e., integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization): Integration was the most popular orientation according to the contact conceptualization, but separation was the most popular one according to the adoption and identification conceptualization.
Keywords :
acculturation orientations , Conceptualization , methodology
Journal title :
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Serial Year :
2003
Journal title :
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Record number :
708124
Link To Document :
بازگشت