Title of article :
ARAB ATTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ATTACK ON AMERICA
The Case of Lebanese Subelites
Author/Authors :
JIM SIDANIUS، نويسنده , , P. J. HENRY، نويسنده , , Felicia Pratto، نويسنده , , Shana Levin، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Abstract :
There are at least two major ways of understanding the attributions that Arab young people used to explain
the September 11th attack on theWorld Trade Center: (a) in terms of a so-called clash of civilizations or an
inherent conflict between Muslim andWestern values or (b) in terms of an antidominance reaction to perceived
American and Israeli oppression of Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular. The authors compare
the relative validities of these two framings using a sample of Lebanese students from the American
University of Beirut. The results from analysis of variance, regression, and structural equation modeling
showed strong, clear, and consistent support for the antidominance attributions and essentially no support for
the clash-of-civilizations attributions.
Keywords :
Terrorism , group dominance , clash of civilizations
Journal title :
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Journal title :
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology