Title of article :
ARAB ATTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ATTACK ON AMERICA The Case of Lebanese Subelites
Author/Authors :
JIM SIDANIUS، نويسنده , , P. J. HENRY، نويسنده , , Felicia Pratto، نويسنده , , Shana Levin، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages :
14
From page :
403
To page :
416
Abstract :
There are at least two major ways of understanding the attributions that Arab young people used to explain the September 11th attack on theWorld Trade Center: (a) in terms of a so-called clash of civilizations or an inherent conflict between Muslim andWestern values or (b) in terms of an antidominance reaction to perceived American and Israeli oppression of Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular. The authors compare the relative validities of these two framings using a sample of Lebanese students from the American University of Beirut. The results from analysis of variance, regression, and structural equation modeling showed strong, clear, and consistent support for the antidominance attributions and essentially no support for the clash-of-civilizations attributions.
Keywords :
Terrorism , group dominance , clash of civilizations
Journal title :
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Serial Year :
2004
Journal title :
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Record number :
708180
Link To Document :
بازگشت