Abstract :
When thousands of tests are performed simultaneously to detect differentially expressed genes
in microarray analysis, the number of Type I errors can be immense if a multiplicity adjustment is not made.
However, due to the large scale, traditional adjustment methods require very stringen significance levels
for individual tests, which yield low power for detecting alterations. In this work, we describe how two
omnibus tests can be used in conjunction with a gene filtration process to circumvent difficulties due to the
large scale of testing. These two omnibus tests, the D-test and the modified likelihood ratio test (MLRT),
can be used to investigate whether a collection of P-values has arisen from the Uniform(0,1) distribution
or whether the Uniform(0,1) distribution contaminated by another Beta distribution is more appropriate.
In the former case, attention can be directed to a smaller part of the genome; in the latter event, parameter
estimates for the contamination model provide a frame of reference for multiple comparisons. Unlike the
likelihood ratio test (LRT), both the D-test and MLRT enjoy simple limiting distributions under the null
hypothesis of no contamination, so critical values can be obtained from standard tables. Simulation studies
demonstrate that the D-test and MLRT are superior to the AIC, BIC, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. A
case study illustrates omnibus testing and filtration.
Keywords :
P-values , Beta contamination model , MMLEs , D-test , MLRT , Multiple comparisons