Spray retention and its effect on weed control by mycoherbicides

Spray retention on scentless chamomile and round-leaved mallow was characterized in relation to droplet size and travel speed. The effect of varying retention on biocontrol efficacy was studied using Colletotrichum truncatum and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. malvae, the bioherbicide agents for the two weeds, respectively. In retention studies, a tracer dye solution was applied using a cabinet sprayer fitted with a fine, medium, or coarse nozzle at travel speeds of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 km/h that resulted in approximate application volumes of 500–2000 L/ha. Retention efficiency, a ratio between the volume retained on plants and actual volume applied, was calculated for each application. In general, finer sprays achieved higher retention efficiency on whole plants of both weeds. On an average, fine sprays resulted in 68% greater retention than coarse sprays on scentless chamomile and 22–59% on round-leaved mallow. Faster travel speeds increased spray retention only slightly. Applying the biocontrol agents at 500 L/ha with different droplet sizes showed different effects on weed control on scentless chamomile and round-leaved mallow. C. truncatum applied with fine droplets was more efficacious than treatments with coarser droplets on scentless chamomile. On round-leaved mallow, however, the efficacy of C. gloeosporioides f. sp. malvae did not appear to be substantially affected by the droplet size. This varying effect may be due to reduced retention on the vertical stems of round-leaved mallow, which is critical to biocontrol of this weed by C. gloeosporioides f.sp. malvae.