Effectiveness of sulfate-reducing passive bioreactors for treating highly contaminated acid mine drainage: I. Effect of hydraulic retention time

Sulfate-reducing passive bioreactors have proved to be an effective technology for the treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) contaminated waters over relatively short periods of time (1–5 a). However, long-term efficiency can be limited by several factors including problems related to the hydraulic properties of the reactive mixture. In this study, the effect of two hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 7.3 d and 10 d on the performance of passive bioreactors was evaluated over an 11-month period for the treatment of a highly contaminated AMD. Evolution of the porosity and hydraulic conductivity of the reactive mixture was also evaluated during the 15-month operation of two bioreactors. Results indicated that bioreactors were effective at both HRTs for increasing the pH and alkalinity of contaminated water and for SO4 and metal removal (60–82% for Fe and up to 99.9% for Cd, Ni and Zn). Although the quality of treated effluent was significantly improved with the 10 d HRT compared to the 7.3 d HRT, results showed that the higher HRT reduced the porosity and the permeability of the reactive mixture which might lead to hydraulic related problems and, eventually, to limited efficiency in long-term operation compared to a shorter HRT. The choice of HRT for a passive bioreactor must therefore consider both the desired quality of treated effluent and the potential for deterioration of hydraulic properties in the reactive mixture.