Title of article :
Should access to the coastal lands of Wales be developed through a
voluntary or statutory approach? A discussion
Author/Authors :
Nick HanleyBegona Alvarez-Farizo، نويسنده , , W. Douglass Shaw، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Abstract :
This paper considers alternative means of rationing access to outdoor recreation areas, focussing on rock-climbing sites in
Scotland. Such rationing is deemed increasingly important due to crowding and environmental externalities, yet cultural and
practical considerations mean that a system of simple entry fees to mountain areas is unrealistic. We use a repeated nested
multinomial logit model to predict the impacts on welfare and trips of two alternative rationing mechanisms currently being
considered by resource managers: (i) the imposition of car-parking fees and (ii) measures to increase access time (the so-called ‘‘long
walk-in’’ policy). The impacts of these policies employed at three different sites (Glencoe, the Cairngorms and Ben Nevis) is
investigated: we find, for example, that a 2 h increase in walk-in time in the Cairngorms reduces predicted visits by 44%, with knockon
effects being felt at other, substitute sites. A d5/day car-parking fee reduces predicted trips to the Cairngorms by 31%. The paper
concludes with a discussion of the role of such rationing mechanisms in future land use policy in the mountains. r 2002 Elsevier
Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords :
Rationing , Mountaineering , Environmental valuation , Recreation Management , Random utility models
Journal title :
Land Use Policy
Journal title :
Land Use Policy