Title of article
Womenʹs perception of pain and distress during intravenous catheterization and urethral mini-catheterization
Author/Authors
Linda Kelley، نويسنده , , David P. Sklar، نويسنده , , David R. Johnson، نويسنده , , Dan T، نويسنده , , berg ، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1997
Pages
3
From page
570
To page
572
Abstract
A study was done to prospectively compare the pain and distress of urethral mini-catheterization (MC) with the pain and distress of intravenous (IV) catheterization in women. Ten-centimeter visual analog scales were used on which the left end represented “no pain” or “no distress” and the right “the worst pain imaginable” or “extreme distress.” Distress was defined to include embarrassment, anxiety, or fear. A convenience sample of 40 adult women who presented to a university emergency department and were undergoing both procedures as part of their management appraised pain and distress after IV placement and urethral MC. The mean IV pain score was 4.2 cm, whereas the mean MC score was only 2.6 cm (P = .02). The IV and MC distress score means were similar (2.3 v 2.6 cm, P = .55). These results suggest that patients perceive urethral MC as less painful than IV placement. The distress scores of these two procedures did not differ and were low in both instances.
Keywords
urinary tract infection , urethral catheterization , pain measurement , intravenous catheterization , Womenיs health
Journal title
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Serial Year
1997
Journal title
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Record number
779322
Link To Document