• Title of article

    The prevalence and implications of incidental findings on ED abdominal CT scans

  • Author/Authors

    Wells A. Messersmith، نويسنده , , David F.M Brown، نويسنده , , Michael J. Barry، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
  • Pages
    3
  • From page
    479
  • To page
    481
  • Abstract
    We reviewed reports from 321 consecutive emergency department (ED) noncontrast, helical “renal stone” abdominal CT scans obtained at a single medical center between April 1996 to June 1997 for incidental findings. Incidental findings were common (45% of scans), and approximately half were rated of “moderate” or “serious” concern by 2 independent reviewers (kappa = 0.72). ED records indicated that only 21 % of incidental findings were documented, and only 11 (18%) of cases with findings of “moderatelsevere” concern had evidence of follow-up on hospital chart review. Although work-up of these 11 cases did not yield any serious diagnoses, many potentially serious incidental findings without follow-up remain worrisome.
  • Keywords
    Incidental finding , computed tomography , nephrolithiasis
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Serial Year
    2001
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Record number

    780109