Title of article
A randomized, double-blind study comparing morphine with fentanyl in prehospital analgesia
Author/Authors
Michel Galinski، نويسنده , , FranCois Dolveck، نويسنده , , Stephen W. Borron، نويسنده , , Loic Tual، نويسنده , , Vincent Van Laer، نويسنده , , Jean-Yves Lardeur، نويسنده , , Frédéric Lapostolle، نويسنده , , Frédéric Adnet، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
6
From page
114
To page
119
Abstract
Study Objective
The aim of this study was to compare, by a randomized double-blind method, morphine (M) and fentanyl (F) in a prehospital setting.
Methods
Consecutive patients with severe, acute pain defined as a visual analog scale score (VASS) of 60/100 or higher were included. The M group received an initial intravenous M injection of 0.1 mg/kg then of 3 mg every 5 minutes. The F group received an initial intravenous F injection of 1 μg/kg then of 30 μg every 5 minutes. The goal of analgesia was a VASS of 30/100 or lower. The end point was the VASS measured 30 minutes after initial administration (VAS [T30]).
Results
There were 26 patients included in the M group and 28 in the F group. Initial VASS(T0) and VASS(T30), mean (95% CI), were 83 (78-88) and 40 (28-52) in the M group and 77 (72-82) and 35 (27-43) in the F group (P = NS). Sixty-two percent of patients in the M group described analgesia as excellent or good vs 76% of those in the F group who did (P = NS). There were no differences in the incidence of side effects in the 2 groups.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that M and F were comparable in treating severe, acute pain in a prehospital setting during the first 30 minutes in spontaneous breathing patients.
Journal title
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Record number
780627
Link To Document