• Title of article

    A randomized, double-blind study comparing morphine with fentanyl in prehospital analgesia

  • Author/Authors

    Michel Galinski، نويسنده , , FranCois Dolveck، نويسنده , , Stephen W. Borron، نويسنده , , Loic Tual، نويسنده , , Vincent Van Laer، نويسنده , , Jean-Yves Lardeur، نويسنده , , Frédéric Lapostolle، نويسنده , , Frédéric Adnet، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    114
  • To page
    119
  • Abstract
    Study Objective The aim of this study was to compare, by a randomized double-blind method, morphine (M) and fentanyl (F) in a prehospital setting. Methods Consecutive patients with severe, acute pain defined as a visual analog scale score (VASS) of 60/100 or higher were included. The M group received an initial intravenous M injection of 0.1 mg/kg then of 3 mg every 5 minutes. The F group received an initial intravenous F injection of 1 μg/kg then of 30 μg every 5 minutes. The goal of analgesia was a VASS of 30/100 or lower. The end point was the VASS measured 30 minutes after initial administration (VAS [T30]). Results There were 26 patients included in the M group and 28 in the F group. Initial VASS(T0) and VASS(T30), mean (95% CI), were 83 (78-88) and 40 (28-52) in the M group and 77 (72-82) and 35 (27-43) in the F group (P = NS). Sixty-two percent of patients in the M group described analgesia as excellent or good vs 76% of those in the F group who did (P = NS). There were no differences in the incidence of side effects in the 2 groups. Conclusion This study demonstrates that M and F were comparable in treating severe, acute pain in a prehospital setting during the first 30 minutes in spontaneous breathing patients.
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Serial Year
    2005
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Record number

    780627