Title of article
Study Objective We compared 2 models of physician leadership for inhospital cardiac arrest teams (CATs): emergency medicine (EM) residents and staff hospitalist physicians. Methods A before-after study was conducted on all adult inhospital CAT activations
Author/Authors
Albert Sae، نويسنده , , Stephen Haverly، نويسنده , , Jeffery Uller، نويسنده , , Marc Shalit، نويسنده , , Geoff Stroh، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
5
From page
311
To page
315
Abstract
Objective
Emergency medical service providers frequently encounter patients with low acuity. Because of liability and safety concerns, emergency medical service systems often prohibit privately owned vehicle (POV) transport. Thus, prehospital resources are used with questionable benefit. In Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, our primary objective was to determine the feasibility of POV. We assessed patient compliance, satisfaction, and safety. Our hypothesis was that POV is feasible with online physician medical control.
Methods
This study was a prospective observational analysis of outcomes from POV during a 1-year period. All POV patients were advised to seek medical attention at a hospital. POV patients were asked questions about their medical complaint and the events during transport and at the hospital.
Results
No documented admissions or patient deterioration was noted. During the survey, all patients were either “all better” (86%) or “somewhat better” (14%).
Conclusion
We conclude that POV with carefully selected patients and online physician medical control is feasible and deserves further study in other systems.
Journal title
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Record number
780679
Link To Document