Title of article
A randomized controlled trial of intranasal fentanyl vs intravenous morphine for analgesia in the prehospital setting
Author/Authors
Claire Rickard، نويسنده , , Peter OʹMeara، نويسنده , , Matthew McGrail، نويسنده , , David Garner، نويسنده , , Alan McLean، نويسنده , , Peter Le Lievre، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
7
From page
911
To page
917
Abstract
Study Objective
The objective of the study was to compare intranasal fentanyl (INF) with intravenous morphine (IVM) for prehospital analgesia.
Methods
This was a randomized, controlled, open-label trial. Consecutive adult patients (n = 258) requiring analgesia (Verbal Rating Score [VRS] >2/10 noncardiac or >5/10 cardiac) were recruited. Patients received INF 180 μg ± 2 doses of 60 μg at ≥5-minute intervals or IVM 2.5 to 5 mg ± 2 doses of 2.5 to 5 mg at ≥5-minute intervals. The end point was the difference in baseline/destination VRS.
Results
Groups were equivalent (P = not significant) for baseline VRS [mean (SD): INF 8.3 (1.7), IVM 8.1 (1.6)] and minutes to destination [mean (SD): INF 27.2 (15.5), IVM 30.6 (19.1)]. Patients had a mean (95% confidence interval) VRS reduction as follows: INF 4.22 (3.74-4.71), IVM 3.57 (3.10-4.03); P = .08. Higher baseline VRS (P < .001), no methoxyflurane use (P < .01), and back pain (P = .02) predicted VRS reduction. Safety and acceptability were comparable.
Conclusions
There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of INF and IVM for prehospital analgesia.
Journal title
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Record number
781305
Link To Document