Title of article
The effects of advance provision of emergency contraception on adolescent womenʹs sexual and contraceptive behaviors
Author/Authors
Melanie A. Gold، نويسنده , , Jennifer E. Wolford، نويسنده , , Kym A. Smith، نويسنده , , Andrew M. Parker، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
10
From page
87
To page
96
Abstract
Context
Advance provision of emergency contraception (EC) may increase timely access and improve effectiveness, but the impact on adolescent sexual and contraceptive behaviors is not known.
Objective
To determine whether adolescents given advance EC have higher sexual and contraceptive risk-taking behaviors compared to those obtaining it on an as-needed basis.
Design and setting
Randomized trial conducted at urban, hospital-based adolescent clinic in Pittsburgh, PA, from June 1997 to June 2002.
Participants
301 predominantly minority, low-income, sexually active adolescent women, age 15–20 years, not using long-acting contraception.
Interventions
Advance EC vs instruction on how to get emergency contraception.
Outcome measures
Self-reported unprotected intercourse and use of condoms, EC, and hormonal contraception ascertained by monthly 10-minute telephone interviews for 6 months post-enrollment. Reported timing of EC use after unprotected intercourse.
Results
At both 1- and 6-month followup interviews, there were no differences between advance EC and control groups in reported unprotected intercourse within the past month or at last intercourse. At 6 months, more advance EC participants reported condom use in the past month compared to control group participants (77% vs 62%, P = 0.02), but not at last intercourse (advance EC 83% vs control 78%, P = 0.34). There were no significant differences by group in hormonal contraception use reported by advance EC or control groups in the past month (44% vs 53%, P = 0.19) or at last intercourse (48% vs 58%, P = 0.20). At the first followup, the advance group reported nearly twice as much EC use as the control group (15% vs 8%, P = 0.05) but not at the final followup (8% vs 6%, P = 0.54). Advance EC group participants began their EC significantly sooner (11.4 hours vs 21.8 hours, P = 0.005).
Conclusions
Providing advance EC to adolescents is not associated with more unprotected intercourse or less condom or hormonal contraception use. In the first month after enrollment, adolescents provided with advance EC were nearly twice as likely to use it and began EC sooner, when it is known to be more effective.
Keywords
Advance provision , adolescent , Author Keywords: Emergency contraception , Contraception use , Post-coital contraception , Condom use
Journal title
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Record number
782998
Link To Document