Quantification of mitral regurgitation orifice area by 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with effective regurgitant orifice area by PISA method and proximal regurgitant jet diameter

Background: The evaluation of mitral regurgitation (MR) by 3-dimensional (3D) echo has generally been performed by reconstruction of Doppler regurgitant jets but there are little data on measuring anatomic regurgitant orifice area (AROA) directly from 3D mitral valve (MV) reconstructions. Methods and results: Transoesophageal echo (TOE) 3D images were acquired from 38 unselected patients (age 59±11 years, ten in atrial fibrillation) with various degrees of MR. In all patients MV was reconstructed en face from the left atrium (LA) and the left ventricle (LV). AROA was measured by planimetry from 3D pictures and compared to the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) by proximal isovelocity surface area and proximal MR jet width from 2D echo. AROA was measured in 95% of patients from LA, 89% from LV and in 84% from both LA and LV. Good correlation was found between EROA and AROA measured from both LA (r=0.97, P<0.0001) and LV (r=0.87, P<0.0001). The mean difference between LA-AROA and EROA was −3.01±6.12 mm2 and −7.18±13.84 mm2 for LV-AROA (P<0.01, respectively). An acceptable correlation was found between the proximal MR jet width and AROA from LA (r=0.71, P<0.0001) and LV perspective (r=0.68, P<0.0001). AROA≥25 mm2 differentiated mild MR (graded 1–2) from moderately severe (graded 3–4) with 80–90% accuracy. Conclusions: 3D TOE provides important quantitative information on both the mechanism and the severity of MR in an unselected group of patients. AROA enables quantification of MR with excellent agreement with the accepted clinical method of proximal flow convergence.