Title of article :
Carvedilol reduces the costs of medical care in severe heart failure: An economic analysis of the COPERNICUS study applied to the United Kingdom
Author/Authors :
Simon Stewart ، نويسنده , , John J.V. McMurray، نويسنده , , Ansgar Hebborn، نويسنده , , Andrew J.S Coats، نويسنده , , Milton Packer and for the COPERNICUS Study Group، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
7
From page :
143
To page :
149
Abstract :
Background The aim of this study was to determine the effects of carvedilol on the costs related to the treatment of severe chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods Costs for the treatment for heart failure within the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom (UK) were applied to resource utilisation data prospectively collected in all patients randomized into the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) Study. Unit-specific, per diem (hospital bed day) costs were used to calculate expenditures due to hospitalizations. We also included costs of carvedilol treatment, general practitioner surgery/office visits, hospital out-patient clinic visits and nursing home care based on estimates derived from validated patterns of clinical practice in the UK. Results The estimated cost of carvedilol therapy and related ambulatory care for the 1156 patients assigned to active treatment was £530,771 (£44.89 per patient/month of follow-up). However, patients assigned to carvedilol were hospitalised less often and accumulated fewer and less expensive days of admission. Consequently, the total estimated cost of hospital care was £3.49 million in the carvedilol group compared with £4.24 million for the 1133 patients in the placebo arm. The cost of post-discharge care was also less in the carvedilol than in the placebo group (£479,200 vs. £548,300). Overall, the cost per patient treated in the carvedilol group was £3948 compared to £4279 in the placebo group. This equated to a cost of £385.98 vs. £434.18, respectively, per patient/month of follow-up: an 11.1% reduction in health care costs in favour of carvedilol. Conclusions These findings suggest that not only can carvedilol treatment increase survival and reduce hospital admissions in patients with severe CHF but that it can also cut costs in the process.
Keywords :
carvedilol , United Kingdom , morbidity , beta blockers , Cost evaluation , Heart Failure
Journal title :
International Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
International Journal of Cardiology
Record number :
827638
Link To Document :
بازگشت