Author/Authors :
Chen Der-Thanq، نويسنده , , David Hung and Yu-Mei Wang، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
There is a common predicament faced by educational designers, that is, the
lack of learning design tools for nontraditional pedagogies of learning. Because
of this lack of alternatives, educational designers often use traditional design
tools (such as task analysis) in contexts where nontraditional learning
activities (such as collaborative projects) are desired. Because the learning
goals of objectivist and alternative epistemologies differ, the designed
instructional/learning activities do not match the original goals or desired
learning outcomes. It is argued that learning design should be understood of
as a quest for congruence between learning epistemologies and designs. This
paper proposes an analytical framework to help identify the congruence or lack
thereof of a learning design. The framework consists of: (1) the employed
epistemology and desired learning outcome, (2) focus of analysis, (3) focus of
design and (4) the design process. It is hoped that this framework will provide
a lever for developing design tools that are more congruent with alternative
pedagogies.