Author/Authors :
Stephen J. Godwin، نويسنده , , Mary S. Thorpe and John T. E. Richardson، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Distance-learning courses were classified with regard to their use of computermediated
interaction and the degree to which such interaction was integrated
into the curriculum and the assessment regime. This produced four groups of
courses varying according to their use of interaction and integration. The
impact of interaction and integration was investigated in terms of their effects
on students’ performance, their perceptions of academic quality and their
approaches to studying. In all three respects, variations within the groups of
courses proved to be more important than variations between the groups.
Interpretation of these results suggests that the adoption of interactive environments
within computer-mediated learning may not be enough in itself to
lead to positive learning outcomes. We found no evidence for this assumption
in terms of students’ completion rates, pass rates, grades, perceptions of the
quality of their courses or approaches to studying. Large variations in the
measured indicators were found between courses, and these appeared to be
largely independent of the effects of interaction and integration. Courses may
differ markedly with regard to how they make use of computer-mediated interaction
and how this is integrated into the curriculum and the assessment
regime. A case study approach is suggested as being more likely to identify the
impact of specific designs based on computer-mediated interaction and to
bring together the diverse student responses arising from the use of such interaction
in their studies.