Abstract :
We consider, in a smooth bounded multiply connected domain D ⊂ R2, the Ginzburg–Landau energy
Eε(u) = 12
D|∇u|2 + 1
4ε2 D(1 − |u|2)2 subject to prescribed degree conditions on each component
of ∂D. In general, minimal energy maps do not exist [L. Berlyand, P. Mironescu, Ginzburg–
Landau minimizers in perforated domains with prescribed degrees, preprint, 2004]. When D has a single
hole, Berlyand and Rybalko [L. Berlyand, V. Rybalko, Solution with vortices of a semi-stiff boundary
value problem for the Ginzburg–Landau equation, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), in press, 2008,
http://www.math.psu.edu/berlyand/publications/publications.html] proved that for small ε local minimizers
do exist. We extend the result in [L. Berlyand, V. Rybalko, Solution with vortices of a semi-stiff
boundary value problem for the Ginzburg–Landau equation, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), in press, 2008,
http://www.math.psu.edu/berlyand/publications/publications.html]: Eε(u) has, in domains D with 2, 3, . . .
holes and for small ε, local minimizers. Our approach is very similar to the one in [L. Berlyand, V. Rybalko,
Solution with vortices of a semi-stiff boundary value problem for the Ginzburg–Landau equation, J. Eur.
Math. Soc. (JEMS), in press, 2008, http://www.math.psu.edu/berlyand/publications/publications.html]; the
main difference stems in the construction of test functions with energy control.
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
