Title of article
A Research Agenda for Cataloging: The CCQ Editorial Board Responds to the Year of Cataloging Research
Author/Authors
Richard P. Smiraglia، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages
7
From page
645
To page
651
Abstract
The cataloging and classification community was called to highlight
2010 as “The Year of Cataloging Research,” and specifically
was challenged to generate research ideas, conduct research, and
generally promote the development of new research in cataloging.
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly has become the most influential
journal of research in cataloging and classification since its
inception in 1981. The idea behind the research reported here was
to give the CCQ editorial board an opportunity to present its point of
view about research for cataloging. A Delphi study was conducted
in three stages during the 2009–2010 academic year. Members
were asked to define the key terms “cataloging,” “evidence,” and
“research,” and to develop a research agenda in cataloging. The
results reveal a basic core definition of cataloging perceived as a
dynamic, active process at the core of information retrieval. An
eight point research agenda emerges that is forward-looking and
embraces change, along with top-ranked calls for new empirical
evidence about catalogs, cataloging, and catalog users.
Keywords
CCQ editorial board , research agenda , Research , year of cataloging research , CCQ , editorial board , DELPHI
Journal title
Cataloging and Classification Quarterly
Serial Year
2010
Journal title
Cataloging and Classification Quarterly
Record number
845656
Link To Document