Title of article :
Psychological Entitlement:
Interpersonal Consequences and Validation
of a Self-RCeAMPBELPLS, YBCOHNOApCLOCIG, ISCHAELL TEONNTI, TELXELoMINEEN, TBUSHMANrt Measure
Author/Authors :
W. Keith Campbell، نويسنده , , Angelica M. Bonacci، نويسنده , , Jeremy Shelton، نويسنده , , Julie J. ExlineBrad J. Bushman، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Abstract :
Nine studies were conducted with the goal of developing a self-report measure of psychological
entitlement and assessing its interpersonal consequences. The Psychological Entitlement
Scale (PES) was found to be reliable and valid (Study 1, 2), not associated with social desirability
(Study 2), stable across time (Study 3), and correlated negatively with two of the Big Five
factors: agreeableness and emotional stability (Study 4). The validity of the PES was confirmed
in studies that assessed willingness to take candy designated for children (Study 5) and reported
deservingness of pay in a hypothetical employment setting (Study 6). Finally, the PES was
linked to important interpersonal consequences including competitive choices in a commons
dilemma (Study 7), selfish approaches to romantic relationships (Study 8), and aggression following
ego threat (Study 9). Psychological entitlement has a pervasive and largely unconstructive
impact on social behavior
Journal title :
Journal of Personality Assessment
Journal title :
Journal of Personality Assessment