Intake, digestion and selection of roughage with different staple lengths by sheep and goats

The diet selection, ingestive and digestive responses of goats and sheep offered a single forage, which was prepared with three staple lengths: long (L), medium (M) and short (S) (mean particle size (mm): 13.29, 7.26 and 0.69, respectively) were studied in three experiments. The sheep (Scottish Blackface wethers) increased their dry matter intake (sheep DMI: 60.1, 61.1 and 66.2 g DM/(kgW0.75) per day for L, M and S) and reduced mean retention time (MRT) of the undigested residues (sheep MRT: 54.6, 52.9 and 45.9 h for L, M and S) and digestive efficiency (sheep DM digestibility: 0.524, 0.522 and 0.493 for L, M and S) with the reduction in forage particle size. The respective responses of goats (feral crosses) were not modified with forage staple length (goat DMI: 68.1, 65.9 and 67.3 gDM/(kg W0.75) per day for L, M and S); (goat MRT: 38.7, 39.3 and 41.1 h for L, M and S); (goat DM digestibility: 0.495, 0.475 and 0.480 for L, M and S). However, both species had similar intakes of digestible dry matter (DDMI) on all staple lengths (mean DDMI: 32.0 and 32.6 g DDM/(kg W0.75) per day for sheep and goats). On the longer staple lengths (L and M) goats masticated the fibre into smaller particles than did sheep and had (P < 0.01) a greater proportion of small particles in their boli (mean: 0.45 and 0.30 for goats and sheep). The selection of components within the forage offered was different for the two species. Goats consumed forage of lower nitrogen (N) (P < 0.01) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (OMD) (P < 0.05) and higher neutral detergent fibre (NDF) (P < 0.01) contents than sheep. This was associated with the residues from sheep having a coarser texture than those of goats. When the forages of different staple lengths were offered in pairs to the animals, there was no evidence for selection of forage types by either species. It would appear that the greater ability of goats to chew efficiently provides a reason for the different responses to staple length in intake, digestibility and MRT by the two species. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved