Author/Authors :
Itzhak Levav، نويسنده , , Anat Shemesh، نويسنده , , Alexander Grinshpoon ·
Efraim Aisenberg، نويسنده , , Yehiel Shershevsky، نويسنده , , Robert Kohn، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background This study explored mental
health-related knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP)
in two kibbutzim (collective villages). These kibbutzim
share many features, e. g., history, origin of the population,
community institutions, and political affiliation.
They differ, however, in that one of them keeps fully the
collectivist ideology, while the other is undergoing privatization;
this is a process that may loosen the solidarity
on which the kibbutz movement was conceived.
Methods A brief self-administered questionnaire exploring
KAP within the kibbutz context was completed
anonymously by 108 members in one kibbutz and 90 in
the other.Univariate and multivariate methods of analyses
were applied.Results Mental health literacy was high,
75% endorsed a multifactorial causation of mental disorders,
and 79% thought that they were treatable. The
definition of what constitutes a mental disorder, however,
was limited, 43% for psychosis and 10% for depression.
Kibbutz members held contrasting attitudes
toward members with mental disorders; while the majority
supported their social integration,85% stated that
their access to the commune’s highest offices would be
denied. The kibbutz would provide financial support
more often to a member with cancer, 94%, than to one
with depression, 81%.Attitudes towards outsiders were
more negative, 68% stated that the kibbutz would refuse
membership to an applicant that recovered from a mental
illness.Use of mental health services was high,with a
lifetime rate in the total sample of 38%. Conclusion The
mental health KAP among these kibbutz members have
not developed in parallel.While the attitudes are mixed
at best, knowledge and practice are more positive. Since
the kibbutz strives to be an egalitarian society and the
members are highly educated, the study of this collective
may suggest the possible KAP ceiling in the general society.
The privatization process initiated in one of the
kibbutzim has not affected the KAP, but the process is
too novel to assess its impact.